Google Translate Disclaimer

A number of pages on the Government of Saskatchewan's website have been professionally translated in French. These translations are identified by a yellow box in the right or left rail that resembles the link below. The home page for French-language content on this site can be found at:

Renseignements en Français

Where an official translation is not available, Google™ Translate can be used. Google™ Translate is a free online language translation service that can translate text and web pages into different languages. Translations are made available to increase access to Government of Saskatchewan content for populations whose first language is not English.

Software-based translations do not approach the fluency of a native speaker or possess the skill of a professional translator. The translation should not be considered exact, and may include incorrect or offensive language. The Government of Saskatchewan does not warrant the accuracy, reliability or timeliness of any information translated by this system. Some files or items cannot be translated, including graphs, photos and other file formats such as portable document formats (PDFs).

Any person or entities that rely on information obtained from the system does so at his or her own risk. Government of Saskatchewan is not responsible for any damage or issues that may possibly result from using translated website content. If you have any questions about Google™ Translate, please visit: Google™ Translate FAQs.

PROVINCE CHALLENGES VALIDITY OF FEDERAL BARLEY PLEBISCITE

Released on March 7, 2007

Agriculture and Food Minister Mark Wartman continues to call the federal government’s plebiscite on barley marketing flawed and undemocratic.

“Through their actions over the past several months, the federal government has created a situation in which producers are not being given a fair and democratic say in the future of grain marketing and the Canadian Wheat Board,” Wartman said.  “The current plebiscite process is flawed, and should not be relied upon to accurately reflect farmers’ opinions on this critical issue.  Federal politicians should not base any decisions about the future of the Wheat Board on the results of this problematic voting process.”

Concerns have been raised by government, producers and industry groups regarding the plebiscite, including the following:

  • The three option question: the plebiscite suggests that there are three options for farmers, when many agree there are only two – the Wheat Board’s single desk, or an open market system.  Numerous studies suggest that the Wheat Board will not participate in a sustainable way in a dual market situation;
  • Management of the plebiscite, including the delayed mailing of the ballots, the makeup of the voter’s list, and the confidentiality of the completed ballots; 
  • The non-binding nature of the plebiscite; and
  • The federal government’s refusal to acknowledge that legislative amendments to the Canadian Wheat Board Act are required to change the Board’s single desk marketing authority.

“Given the many questions and doubts surrounding the validity of this process, the federal government must not make any changes to legislation governing the Canadian Wheat Board – to implement either an open or dual market system - based on the results of this plebiscite,” Wartman concluded.

-30-

For more information, contact:

Scott Brown
Agriculture and Food
Regina
Phone: 306-787-5160
Email: sbrown@agr.gov.sk.ca 

We need your feedback to improve saskatchewan.ca. Help us improve