Google Translate Disclaimer

A number of pages on the Government of Saskatchewan`s web site have been professionally translated in French. These translations are identified by a yellow text box that resembles the link below and can be found in the right hand rail of the page. The home page for French-language content on this site can be found here:

Renseignements en Français

Where an official translation is not available, Google™ Translate can be used. Google™ Translate is a free online language translation service that can translate text and web pages into different languages. Translations are made available to increase access to Government of Saskatchewan content for populations whose first language is not English.

The results of software-based translation do not approach the fluency of a native speaker or possess the skill of a professional translator. The translation should not be considered exact, and may include incorrect or offensive language Government of Saskatchewan does not warrant the accuracy, reliability or timeliness of any information translated by this system. Some files or items cannot be translated, including graphs, photos, and other file formats such as portable document formats (PDFs).

Any person or entities that rely on information obtained from the system does so at his or her own risk. Government of Saskatchewan is not responsible for any damage or issues that may possibly result from using translated website content. If you have any questions about Google™ Translate, please visit: Google™ Translate FAQs.

Integrated Weed Management

By: Joanne Kowalski PAg, -- Regional Crops Specialist Prince Albert

Over the past decade, an increase in the number of herbicide resistant weeds has caused researchers and producers to look for weed management systems that can diminish the rate of occurrence. Right now, there are 461 unique cases of herbicide resistant weeds around the globe:

  • The rapid increase in Group 9 (EPSP synthase inhibitor) or glyphosate resistant weeds over the past 20 years is of large concern because of the quick increase from zero in 1995 to 30 in 2015.
  • Resistance to Group 2 herbicides, which are protein production inhibitors, has seen the fastest rise from zero species in 1985 to more than 160 in 2015.  
  • Groups 5, 6 and 7 (photosynthesis inhibitors) have the next highest number of resistant species, increased from zero species in 1985 to 105 in 2015. 
  • Group 1 (ACCase inhibitors) is next at zero in 1985 to a little more than 45 in 2015. 
  • Group 4 (synthetic auxins/growth regulator) has increased steadily from zero in 1985 from to 30 in 2015.

 Canada has 60 weed species verified as herbicide resistant. In Saskatchewan, there are about 14:

  • Group 2 resistance: cleavers, kochia, wild oat, chickweed, shepherd’s purse, wild and ball mustard, redroot pigweed, Russian thistle, stinkweed, and hemp nettle.
  • Group 1 resistance: Persian darnel
  • Group 1 and Group 3:  green foxtail
  • Group 9: kochia.

During the adoption of zero-tillage practices from 1990 to 2005, the use of an integrated approach to weed management was an important part of the extension message from the Saskatchewan Soil Conservation Association.

An integrated weed management, or a “many little hammers” approach, is acknowledged as necessary to manage the increase. The hammers include:

  • Seeding Rate: increased seeding rate can provide better crop competition, but it is more expensive.
  • Row Spacing: narrower row spacing in studies shows lower weed biomass, especially when combined with higher seeding rates. 
  • Fertilizer Placement: placing the fertilizer into the soils rather than broadcasting results in improved competitiveness of crops and improved yields.
  • Seed Size: using larger seeds can reduce weed biomass and seed production.
  • Seeding Date: the earlier the better, to allow the crop to get a head start on establishment. This interferes with the weed seed’s ability to germinate and grow, as they are biologically adapted to faster development. A north-south seeding orientation results in shade between rows may reduce weed seed germination and growth.
  • Competitive Cultivars: they are better competitors with weeds, especially when combined with other methods.
  • Silaging/Green Feed: can reduce weed seed populations. Using perennial crops in rotation leads to greater competition for reducing weed populations.
  • Rotating Herbicide Groups: a long-standing integrated weed management tool. However, we now know utilizing herbicides with more than one group in them delays herbicide resistance more effectively than rotating single-group herbicides.

Integrated weed management that recognizes the use of multiple methods of control, both agronomic and chemical, is now a vital function of overall production management. As Eric Johnson of the Crop Development Centre said at the Agronomy Research Update in 2016, “None of the individual control measures provide acceptable control on their own.”

For more information, please contact your local regional office or the Agriculture Knowledge Centre at 1-866-457-2377.

We need your feedback to improve Help us improve